Trip

Georgia spends its money on what?


Georgia spends its money on what?

Andisheh NouraeeComments

Gov. Nathan Deal’s refusal to accept an expansion of Medicaid, or to set up a health insurance exchange in Georgia as required by the Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare) aren’t new news. Deal made it clear he’d reject an expansion of Medicaid not long after the Supreme Court‘s ACA ruling made it easier for states to decline. And Deal telegraphed his decision about exchanges for months before he made it official on November 16.

Some background: The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that if Georgia accepted the Medicaid expansion under the ACA, the state would pay $2.5 billion over a decade. In turn, D.C. would funnel an estimated $33 billion into health care in Georgia during the same period. The results: half a million otherwise uninsured Georgians would have health insurance, and roughly $33 billion in new economic activity in a state with higher-than-the-national-average unemployment. To put those numbers in perspective, the state government’s total budget for the current fiscal year is $19.3 billion.

Deal’s reason for rejecting the Medicaid expansion? He says the state can’t afford it. For the sake of not arguing the ACA yet again, let’s take Deal at his word and accept his assertion that the state can’t afford $250 million per year in expenses in return for insuring 500,000 people and an additional $3 billion or so annually in economic activity.

Okay? Fine.

Fast forward to Wednesday (which was actually two days ago, but you know what I mean).

WSB-TV:

In case you’re in a non-video mood, it’s a clip of Gov. Deal voicing his support for a new stadium for the Atlanta Falcons. The stadium would cost the state around $300 million.

You know those obnoxious jerks who judge poor people harshly for their perceived bad spending choices? Well, today I’m that obnoxious person. And Georgia is that guy who just bought a nice, new car to park in front of his run-down house.

You Might Also Like

3 Comments

  1. 1
  2. 2

    Reagan and Limbaugh co1ervatives while taking the mantle of Goldwater co1ervatism are hardly libertarian and don&1quo;t despise Erickson. The religious right adore them and Erickson.
    Now Bill Buckley co1ervatives or Ron Paul Co1ervatives you bet.

  3. 3

    Just because I have white and flag in the same sentence you already have me as a racist, I have blacks,Mexica1 and gas in my family. I don&1quo;t care what color, religion or sexual preference is,that is part of all of our history learn from it and move on,try to be better than them before us.the flag never symbolize racism it was state rights, it was the only way of living they new.it&1quo;s time to move on,celebrating your past but also learning from it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>